Article

American and Southwest Airlines pay substantially more than Spirit Airlines for identical FAA services

On January 24, we shared a recent study that documented the effects of airline ticketing practices on the fees paid to the FAA.

On January 24, we shared a recent study that documented the effects of airline ticketing practices on the fees paid to the FAA for air traffic and airport services (see Unbundling ticketing practices cost the AATF and impact airline competition). The chart below highlights the inequitable and anti-competitive effects of unbundling, when it is considered with the federal ticket tax of 7.5%. As shown below, for flights in the BWI to MIA market, Southwest passengers pay $9.45 more per flight, and American passengers pay $7.42 more per flight. For the entire flight, the difference in revenue contributed to the AATF for FAA services could amount to well over $1,000.

Flight itinerary for BWI to MIA (pax with one carry-on, one checked bag and the least expensive advanced seat assignment)

  Spirit American Southwest
Listed Fare $106.89 $205.90 $232.99
Seat Assignment $21.00 no charge no charge
Carry on $58.00 no charge no charge
One checked bag $48.00 $30.00 no charge
Total Pax Cost $233.89 $235.90 $232.99
Pax Ticket Tax (7.5%) $8.02 $15.44 $17.47
Flight Segment Tax $4.80 $4.80 $4.80
Total Tax $12.82 $20.24 $22.27
Tax as % of Total Ticket 5.5% 8.6% 9.6%

 

As noted in the linked article, policymakers could address this legal loophole in two ways. First, they could legislate that all passenger revenue collected from airline passengers be taxed at the same rate. Second, policymakers could change the FAA's funding to a cost-based air traffic model utilized by the vast majority of air navigation service providers around the world. For the member states of Eurocontrol, for example, the following non-discrimination policy applies:

Charges are calculated with the same rules, the same formula, and the same tariffs applied to all airspace users (see https://www.eurocontrol.int/crco).

Rather than policymakers getting overly prescriptive about airline ticketing practices, adopting a non-discriminatory policy (as the FAA requires for airports in their assessment of airline rates and charges) would appear to be the most straightforward course.

Off

Subscribe to our newsletter, The Edit

We are Steer

Yes, you are in the right place. After 40 years, we have changed our name from Steer Davies Gleave to mark our growing international footprint and our expanding portfolio into sectors beyond transport.

Explore our new website to learn more about Steer: who we are, how we work and what our future holds.

Related insights

  • 22 Oct 2025
    Article

    Game Changers: The megatrends that will redefine global infrastructure

    Jon Peters
    Associate Director

    Our latest global insight report exploring the forces transforming how we move, power, and connect the world.

    Read more

  • 28 Nov 2022
    Article

    Perspectives on FAA Reauthorization: Creating a Sustainable Funding Model

    Stephen D. Van Beek
    Director

    On September 30, 2023, the authority for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and its programs will expire.

    Read more

  • 23 Nov 2022
    Article

    Steer views on the Autumn Statement 2022

    By Steer

    UK Chancellor Jeremy Hunt outlined three priorities of stability, growth and public services as part of his Autumn Statement.

    Read more

  • 22 Sep 2022
    Article

    The "tripwire" summer is over, it is time to tone down the rhetoric and find solutions

    Stephen D. Van Beek
    Director

    A rough summer for aviation operations and customer service has come to a close.

    Read more

  • 11 Sep 2022
    Article

    The Biden-Harris Economic Blueprint: Implications for Transport & Aviation Policy

    Stephen D. Van Beek
    Director

    On Sept 9, the White House released the President's Economic Blueprint, laying out "five pillars" for the economic agenda going forward.

    Read more